Tag Archive for: theology

What is so sacred about sex? – Part 2

This continues from part 1…..

In part one of this article, we discussed the sexual mood of our present culture and whether or not as human beings, we are the owners of our own bodies and minds. We ended on the note that if it is the case that we have been made or created by someone else for his own purposes, then surely we would have a lot more obligations than we would have if we only belonged to ourselves. But we also noted that, this is a big “IF” because some people do not believe (or at least they live as if they don’t believe) that there is any Being higher than ourselves, to whom we must be responsible. Is it reasonable to believe that an actual Being exists who is responsible for our existence and to whom we might be accountable to, regarding our sexual lives? If there is the possibility for such a Being to exist, why would he be interested in what we do with our bodies sexually?

For starters, let us be brutally honest with ourselves: everything in this world – from ourselves to the flowers to the stars to sea to animals etc – points to the fact that some sort of careful designing has gone into the creation of our world and of ourselves, doesn’t it? We often take it for granted that this physical world of ours is structured the way it is. But mathematically speaking, the probability of this world happening by a mindless random or unordered process is incredibly small. According to Astrophysicist Hugh Ross’ conservative calculation, the chance of a planet like ours existing in the universe is about 1 in a trillion billion billion (i.e. 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or 1 in 10 raised to the power 30).

 Scientists are discovering that had even a single feature of our universe been just a little bit different, the stars, galaxies and human life would not exist. Let us briefly look at a few amazing scientific discoveries before we go on. The distance from the earth to the sun is just right. Why? Even a small change of around 2% and all life would cease. If the earth was too near the sun, water would evaporate. If it was too far from the sun, its coldness level would not support life. In fact, even the rotation speed of the earth is just right; if it was too slow, the temperature differences between day and night would be too extreme, and if it was too fast the wind speeds would be catastrophic. Furthermore, if the ratio of the electromagnetic and gravitational forces had differed by about one part in ten thousand billion billion billion billion (i.e. 1 part in 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000), then stars such as the Sun, which are capable of supporting life, could not exist. Do you see any picture emerging?

The delicate balance of the elements in our universe, to use the illustration of the theoretical physicist Paul Davies, is like the accuracy level that a marksman needs in order to hit a coin twenty billion light years away on the other side of the observable universe. [A light year is the speed travelled by light in one year. And light, by the way, has the fastest travelling speed in our universe]. In fact it has been noted by some researchers that the earth is placed precisely in a part of the universe that is congenial to scientific studies in cosmology, galactic astronomy, stellar astrophysics and geophysics. That is, if our earth had been positioned in a part of the universe with too much starlight, we could not have been able to see into deep space. There are more than 3000 galaxies in the observable universe, each containing millions to trillions of stars – many being bigger than the earth.

Further, Oxford mathematician John Lennox in his book, ‘God’s undertaker: has Science buried God?’, notes that the distinguished mathematician and astronomer, Sir Fred Hoyle, admitted that his atheism was shaken profoundly when he discovered the degree of fine-tuning needed between the nuclear ground state energy levels in order for carbon to be formed either by a combination of three helium nuclei, or by a combination of nuclei of helium and beryllium. (And for the record, life cannot exist on earth without an abundant supply of carbon). Sir Hoyle’s discovery, according to Lennox, led him to remark that, “a superintellect has monkeyed with physics as well as with chemistry and biology,” and that “there are no blind forces in nature worth talking about.” Interesting isn’t it? And let us not forget the issue of the human DNA – the molecule containing coded instructions for the cells in the body. A group of scientists have recently estimated that the adult body contains about 37.2 trillion cells, each containing DNA. Each person’s complete DNA is unique; the exception being identical twins. The instructions are in what is called Genetic language and they are detailed, complex and specific. These instructions include for example, which cells should grow and when, which cells should die and when, which cells should make hair and what colour it should be.  If all this sounds too technical, then let me make it simple: the scientific discoveries are pointing in the direction where it is highly unlikely that an intelligent Being did not plan and execute the creation of this whole skilfully crafted universe, including human beings like us.

What is my point with all this information? It is this: if conditions in this universe, and the nature of our human bodies, are the way they are – so delicately precision-tuned – and if human beings like us posses the kind of intelligence we posses, even to study them, then it is very reasonable to (and unreasonable not to) suppose that a more intelligent Being, (1) is out there, (2) is the cause of our beings and (3) is interested in our lives. Now if we relate this thought to Mr. Lewis’ thoughts about moral duties (discussed in part one of this article), we can say with a fair degree of confidence that the whole of mankind must have a Landlord. Our bodies, strictly speaking, are not ours. Our Landlord is this Intelligent Being who created this world and everything in it. Religious folks simply call him, God. Since this God is the cause of our intricately designed bodies and existence, it is not mind-boggling that any “Dos and Don’ts” on how we use our bodies should come from him.

 

A Curious Worldview

 In his speech to the members of the city council of Athens, Paul the apostle of Christ tried to give them a new view of God, saying, “God, who made the world and everything in it, is Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples made by human hands.” (Acts 17:24 GNB) In a city so used to building alters and shrines for every imaginable god, this news was however unimaginable. But to the people in the city of Corinth (a city well-known for its immorality), who became believers in Jesus Christ, Paul wrote them a letter in which he explained to them the sacredness of their bodies: “…the body is not to be used for sexual immorality, but to serve the Lord, and the Lord provides for the body. God raised the Lord [i.e. Jesus] from death and will also raise us by his power. … Don’t you know that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit, who lives in you and who was given to you by God? You do not belong to yourselves but to God; he bought you for a price. So use your bodies for God’s glory.” (1 Cor. 6: 13,14, 19,20 GNB). Dr Ravi Zacharias, a Christian philosopher, appropriately explains that, “the Christian walks with God, not to God. We no longer go to the temple to worship. Rather we go with our temples to worship.” The body of a believer in Christ, rather than a church building, is the holy dwelling place of God and must be treated as “holy grounds.” Thus what this person wears, or touches, or says, or looks at or reads or listens to must uphold God’s holiness.

So much for the Christian “bodies”! What bearing does this worldview have on those who do not subscribe to it? The non-Christian is a prospective temple of God. God wants to live in this person. The Christian explanation for human existence in general is that God made us and not only that, but also that he made us all for himself (Col. 1:16) and he made us in such a way that only in union with him can our greatest good be had (John 10:10). Sin does not allow this to happen. But God became man in Jesus Christ, lived uprightly among us, identified with our human weaknesses, paid for our sins in his death and rose up and wants to live in us to empower us to live as we ought to. Like C. S. Lewis once observed, God invented us in a certain sense like how a man invents an engine. And when a car is made to run of gasoline, it would not run properly on anything else. In this same sense God made the “human machine,” as Lewis puts it, to run on himself.

The fuel we need in order to function the way he designed us is God himself and the food we need to keep our souls spiritually alive is God himself. We cannot expect to function properly on our own terms. Sexual fulfillment (a major hunger of our generation) with its proper joy, peace and security does not come through the pulling down of God’s boundaries. Without God at the centre of a sexual relationship, our much desired real and secure intimacy which we often believe can be found in sexual intercourse will prove elusive. Any person, Christian or not, who tries to outsmart God on this front will soon find that the last laugh is always God’s, not ours; restlessness, emptiness, meaninglessness, broken trust, guilt and shame will ultimately come resting at our door steps. There is definitely pleasure in sin but it is fleeting. Kenyan Christian Apologist, John Njoroge, insightfully says that, “Trying to meet our real needs without God is like trying to satisfy our thirst with salty water: the more we drink, the thirstier we become.  This is a sure path to various sorts of addictions.”

Even in our limited wisdom, we realize that playing our cherished game of football without any rules does not make it really enjoyable. So we have created rules, in all their imperfections. Even with the rules in place, some people hurt others and get hurt themselves; they offend and get offended during the course of the game. Can you imagine the unbridled chaos that would exist if there were no clear rules? In the same way, we are living in an increasing sexually chaotic culture today because we are desperately throwing off God’s moral restraints: husbands and wives are sleeping with people other than their spouses, young unmarried boys and girls are “training” themselves in the act of sex yet ironically the idea of marriage is appearing uncomfortable to them because of its widely acknowledged moral limitations. God has provided a framework within which sex can be properly enjoyed physically, emotionally and spiritually, and it is not outside marriage.

 In God’s scheme of things, according to Christian teachings, you do not need to be experienced in sex before marriage. This is because you have the whole of your married life to get to know your spouse’s body (God’s gift to you) as your bodies lock and your spirits mesh in sexual intercourse before God. With each encounter you get to know the body of your spouse even better to the glory of God. And here is the rich wisdom of the Christian faith (which may seem foolish on the face of it): Any person who genuinely relies on Jesus Christ before his marriage and also during his marriage will be given the grace and spiritual strength to stay the course of marriage should he find out that he has ended up with a sexually defective spouse. Tough to take in, I know, but I cannot make this truth any more appealing than it sounds right now in a time like ours. Marriage is not a selfish enterprise, where if you are not having a sexually exciting life everything else must come crushing down for everyone in it. Rather it is essentially a self-giving worship of God as you commit yourself exclusively to that one person, to love, to cherish and to seek the good of this person always.

 The Christian scriptures teach that all who trust in God will not be disappointed, ultimately. But break God’s precepts on sex (or on any other issue of life) and you can be sure that you will not only separate yourself from God and into a dark loneliness of the soul but you will also hurt yourself and others. Let us be clear: the idea that God is an unloving and unfeeling Judge up there who is simply watching down to see who has gone even slightly wrong so that he may swiftly punish him, is wrong. God wants to reconcile us back to himself. This is the Christian message to the world. God’s precepts in the Bible are intended to facilitate our happiness and not to stifle it. A parent sternly warns her child to steer clear of fire not because she wants to make the child miserable but because she wants to prevent the child from getting hurt or even dying. How can a child enjoy life when he is hurt or dead? If we separate ourselves spiritually from God (a spiritual death), through sin, how can we expect to receive God’s best? God knows the limits within which our best can be had. Stolen waters are not as sweet as we want to believe. Many people may look happy on the outside but on the inside they may be empty, restless, bitter and troubled because they have violated God in this area of sex.

Conclusion

We were made for God and if we spend ourselves in illegitimate pleasures, we will only come away broken and impoverished in our souls (and perhaps with physical scars too). No one enriches his soul by being sexually immoral. Rather we bankrupt ourselves spiritually; we feel the emptiness, restlessness of the soul, the guilt and shame of sin because we have divorced ourselves from God, who is our ultimate good. A more serious side to sexual immorality is that in the end, we must give account of our lives to the God. Some people realize this quicker than others but the important thing is that we are willing to take the necessary steps back to God through the path he has provided – faith in his Son, Jesus Christ. And to be clear, faith in Jesus Christ is not mere intellectual belief in Jesus as Lord but includes a willful commitment to live the whole of one’s life in reverence of him and his teachings. Christ offers forgiveness and rebirth even to the one who has wrecked himself or herself sexually yet is willing to repent. Are you a mess, sexually? Jesus gives hope and strength to those seeking to please God in their sexual lives.

The really hard questions of life…

A brother recently shared this with me: He said, “The hardest questions about life (for Christians) are not the Theological ones (and they can be very difficult) but the existential ones.”

I’m sure by now many of us have seen the video of the Ugandan househelp brutalising the little child left in her care. I’m not yet a parent, but I can tell that any parent in their right mind will not hesitate to rain down fire and brimstone on any person who did 10% of what that househelp did.

This video was the subject of discussion I was having with my friend when he made the point about the hardest questions Christians ask.

When he saw the video, his mind went to his nine month child and he said to me “I told myself there would be no place that girl would go to keep her safe from me”. Of course I’m paraphrasing, but you get the picture. It evokes a strong sense of the need to bring retribution and the worst form of punishment upon this househelp.

And then my friend said his wife sent him a follow up on the video that the househelp was so badly beaten by the child’s father that she was in a wheelchair and had to be fed through a tube. (Now I’m not sure that part of the story is true). But upon hearing it, my friend did say that he felt a sense of calm and peace and some small joy because the right thing had been done. The father had gotten some justice for his helpless child.

And then my friend said he felt this question screaming itself at him, “WHAT WOULD JESUS DO?”

These are the hard questions we ask. The existential ones.

The househelp made in the image of God. A person for whom Christ died. Someone Christ loves and yet, someone whom I, – who likes to call himself a living breathing Christian, filled with the Holy Ghost, – wants to see beaten, punished as brutally as humanely possible (and I would have done it if I was close to her… I would have cast the first stone and proudly done so…) and all this with zero love and compassion in my heart for her.

This is the love and compassion I demand (beg) of Christ when I sin against Him. When I confess my sins. This is the love and compassion I have spoken about when I have taught countless numbers of people about forgiving others as Christ has forgiven us.

After all, all sin is ultimately against God and so her sin is first and foremost against God. And if God, the offended party seeks to bring her to a place of repentance so He bestows her with her forgiveness, using us (Christians) as vessels… then…

But yet, I still want to hit her. Do something to make her hurt as much as she hurt the little child. She sinned against the child, and the family of the child, and me and all of the social media universe. We are all angry!!!

And for many Christians, we are too angry to ask, “What would Jesus do?”.

Jesus wrote on the floor (in the sand) and asked the Pharisees, “Let Him who is without sin cast the first stone”. When they (the raging angry crowd) had all left , He said to her, the adulterous woman, “Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.”

The hardest questions we ask are the existential ones. How do we establish Christ’s kingdom on earth as it is in heaven as he has so demanded of us?

What would Jesus do? What would He do in this particular case?

I’m sure He (Jesus) would forgive. I’m sure He would forget. I’m sure He would lead the househelp to the knowledge of her sin and to her need for salvation. He’d introduce her to Himself, the living Saviour and give her a hope that would give her everlasting life.

Beyond that, He would come and dwell in her heart and make her a new creation. One whose life would be so devoted to Him it would be a marvel for the world.

He most certainly would not hurt this househelp. NO! He’d reach out to her with His love. He’s always doing this.

“But Jesus isn’t the father of the baby”, I argued with myself. No He isn’t. But can the father of the baby love his child more than Jesus does?

These are the hard questions we ask. The existential ones.

Now I’m not saying that she should not be punished for her deed. I’m not saying that she should be hugged and given warm glass of milk. No. Not at all.

There are laws that govern our society. These laws have punitive measures that enforce some order in our society. Without the laws and their punishments our society will descend into anarchy.

But these laws and their punitive detractors are careful to treat the worst of offenders (criminals) with a dignity and a respect for their humanity they do not provide their victims.

So if the laws of every “civil” society reaches out to protect the humanity of the worst criminal offenders, then how much more the Christian?

The existential questions are hard…

But as hard as our existential questions may be, Jesus models the answers for us in his person and character and this is the character and person we are to emulate, after all, why are we called Christians?

 

Your God is Too Small – A New Creation

I’ve heard this statement “Your God is too small” used in certain Christian circles to denote a certain lack of faith in God’s ability to do supposedly mighty things for a person. I find that quite an interesting statement, but even more so very applicable to my current post (and a few others to come with it soon). So I’ll appropriate that title, but for a different purpose and we’ll see why as we go along.

 

In recent times I’ve downloaded and installed a new version of a certain Android bible (YouVersion), which comes with the latest NIV (2011) version. Suffice it to say that the name of that app itself is subject to questioning, but I digress. Interestingly I came across one of the all-time favorite passages of Christendom – 2 Cor 5:17. The 1984 version of the NIV (which is the widely known version) puts it this way).

“Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come”

And yet the modern translation says this

“Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come; The old has gone, the new is here!”

Now for those who are about to charge the writers of NIV 2011 with changing the word of God, heresy, blasphemy, unfaithfulness to scripture and many other such accusations, I will gladly ask you to find out how Bibles are translated, and how versions of Bibles are updated over time. And for those who judge every other bible by the standard of the King James Version, you will find that “God does not speak King James”, as my friend Kwame Antwi-Boasiako puts it. Such a discourse will take another post altogether, one which someday will be put together.

But indeed I smiled when I saw this. Here was one of those passages which had been one of the foremost evangelistic tools of Protestantism, being shown in a different but extremely important perspective. Not that the previous translation was incompatible with Jesus’s sayings or Paul’s teachings, but because the now corrected construction points to one of the points that is missing in Christendom today. And I will illustrate why with this short scenario.

We read a passage at church the other day, and I asked a question about that passage, answers to which showed` the problem. Jesus was speaking to his disciples, and he made this statement to them.

“I tell you the truth, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the kingdom of God” (Luke 9:27).

The question then logically arose how it is possible that Peter, Andrew et al will not die before the kingdom of God comes. Are they still alive today? Did Jesus Christ mean what he was saying or was he smoking something we haven’t heard of yet? Or was there some “spiritual” meaning to what he said?

Try as my brothers at church did, many gave all sorts of theories, from the absurd to the plausible but unlikely. And I know that if I asked many contemporary Christians the same question, I will get the same kind of answers from them. But everyone excluded the 1 possibility:

THAT THE KINGDOM OF GOD HAD ALREADY BEGUN

No, there is no “spiritual” meaning to it; neither was Jesus smoking the pot when he said this. Peter doesn’t need to be alive and waiting 2000 years and more to be part of the kingdom of God. The kingdom of God was inaugurated by Jesus’s presence on this earth, and he said this so many times it is surprising that so many people (including myself for a long time) haven’t noticed (Matt 12:28; Lk 4:18-21; Lk 17:20-21).

Jesus’s breaking into this world signified that God has begun changing the world and that man and women are being called into his kingdom to work with him against the kingdoms of this world. Jesus came to lay claim to the whole world as his, and to point out to the world that God had anointed him king of this world, and that everyone needed to submit to him to be a part of his kingdom (Col 1:15-20). And he showed us how – not in overthrowing the world with violence and guns (whether automatic, semi-automatic or non-automatic), but with deeds that speak of the character of their king. The point about the kingdom of God that many Christians miss is that it CANNOT work using the methods of the world, or else it will be defeated by the corrupting influence of the world. It must work with the methods of its king, who lays his life down for others, who calls the leaders to be servants, who is good news to the poor, who challenges the status quo and its comfort zones (including the religious elite), who feeds the flock before feeding himself (and not fleecing them rather – as is the dominant case both politically and religiously).

So therefore the newer translation of 1 Corinthians 5:17 makes a lot of sense to me. For if Jesus’s breaking into this world signifies a changed world then indeed when a person is in Christ, he is not just a new creation, but CREATION HAS BECOME NEW TO HIM. They now live by a new set of rules, serves a different king and belong to a different people. The world is no longer the same to them, because of the following below.

  1. He answers to a new king
  2. He belongs to a new people
  3. He is a new person.

The order is important. The gospel was always about the kingship of Jesus and not about salvation from sin, though it included it. If you doubt it, take the time to read and digest properly all the sermons preached by both Paul and Peter in the book of Acts (2:14-36; 10:34-43; 13:16-40; 17:22-31). To help you navigate this course better, you can look up New Testament scholars like Scott McKnight’s “The King Jesus Gospel”, or NT Wright’s “How God became King”.

Secondly, the gospel called us to be included amongst the people of God by repentance and baptism, and to live with those people who by the Spirit of God in them are fulfilling their King’s purpose and mission. And as we work with these people and we obey our king and his Spirit’s leading, we are further transformed both as a people, and as individuals.

But today the gospel has been turned upside down. Everything is now centered on the number 3 person in the order above. Everything is about how Jesus will solve “my problems”, how he will “make me rich and prosperous”. The number 1 thing that enabled sin to enter the world today – the sin of not submitting to God, but putting ourselves in the center of everything – is the same thing that our gospel has become about. Me.

And when I meet Christians who think Jesus is all about a “personal relationship”, the phrase that comes into my head most often is the title of this post – your God is too small. Your God isn’t the Jewish Messiah – king of this world, who demands that mankind abandon the ways of this world in pursuit of him, who requires that mankind learn to live in peace and in submission and servitude to one another for the purpose of his kingdom, who requires a change in the deepest of hearts of each individual person. No, your god is a genie in a bottle, and when you feel low or your next bout of narcissism shows up, you rub the bottle with some “prayers and tongues, with plenty ‘overcoming’ faith”, say what you want him to do for you, and go about your business, paying no heed to the kingdom of God, which is indeed amongst us, but hidden from our eyes.

This discourse is not over yet, and in my next post we will take a historical look at how the gospel of Jesus changed (or our God became smaller) through the course of history through a better look at the popular Christian creeds.